Thanks enormously to Donald for this
At first sight (and I may be wrong), this seems the sort of
typically cumbersome and bureaucratic document that we've learnt to
expect from the European Union. It's an unwieldy amalgam of the
CISG, the CFR and various consumer provisions spatchcocked together
in an enormous document of nearly 200 sections, many of them pretty
convoluted. But despite this, it also I notice contains an almost
incredible provision peremptorily forbidding courts to refer to any
other system of law whatever in trying to understand it - see Art
4.2).
Quite apart from the substantive content (which will certainly take
me some days to digest), the rules as to applicability alone verge
on the bizarre. To begin with, there are vary many provisions which
can't be ousted by agreement, but then the regime doesn't apply at
all unless specifically chosen (and pretty formally at that, at
least in consumer cases -- Art 8.2 of the Regulation). What does
this mean? If English law allows me to contract on what terms I
like, and I contract on the terms of the sales law but exclude the
duty of good faith, what follows? Am I regarded as having chosen the
new regime so that the exclusion is void, or as not having chosen
the new regime at all? We're then told the regime can't be chosen
in part in consumer contracts (Regulation, Art 8.3). What does this
signify? Suppose I draft a consumer agreement that quotes a number
of sections from the new sales law: is this effective or not? If it
isn't the new law is an ass: if it is, Art 8.3 is, like Cinderella,
all dressed up with nowhere to go. Similarly with the prohibition on
using the new regime between traders neither of whom is an SME (the
apparent result of Regulation, Art 7.1) or for mixed contracts
(Regulation, Art 6.1).
Or am I missing the point somewhere?
Andrew
On 11/10/11 12:32, Donald Macdonald wrote:
Dear all,
The European Commission has just issued its proposed contract
law harmonisation instrument, following on its "Feasibility
Study" and Draft Common Frame of Reference:
It is proposed to be a Regulation for an optional sales law
(ie parties will be able to opt into it). Existing IPL rules
will still apply, and some aspects of contract law (eg
representation, illegality) aren't covered. Besides sales,
supply of digital content and related services (eg repairs)
are to be covered. It will apply to cross-border sales (etc)
which are business-to-consumer, or are B - to - B with at least
one being a Small or Medium Enterprise (at least one of the
countries being an EU member state). Member states will be
able to extend this to domestic sales and non-SME contracts.
Ross Macdonald (Uni of Dundee)
************************************************************
Please consider the environment. Do
you really need to print this email?
The University of Dundee is a registered Scottish charity, No:
SC015096
--
Andrew Tettenborn
Professor of Commercial Law, Swansea University
School of Law, University of
Swansea
Richard Price Building
Singleton Park
SWANSEA SA2 8PP
Phone 01792-602724 / (int) +44-1792-602724
Fax 01792-295855 / (int) +44-1792-295855
|
Andrew
Tettenborn
Athro yn y Gyfraith Fasnachol, Prifysgol Abertawe
Ysgol y Gyfraith, Prifysgol
Abertawe
Adeilad Richard Price
Parc Singleton
ABERTAWE SA2 8PP
Ffôn 01792-602724 / (rhyngwladol) +44-1792-602724
Ffacs 01792-295855 / (rhyngwladol) +44-1792-295855
|
Lawyer
(n): One versed in
circumvention of the law (Ambrose Bierce)
Sent from a Microsoft-free
zone -- keeping computing free